Monday, June 30, 2014

The People We Choose to Honor


Back in February of this year, I wrote a post titled "Who Gets the Statue?" which reported on the proliferation of statues of former Soviet dictator Josef Stalin in Russia and asked why it was considered okay to erect a statue to the dictator who murdered millions of his own people* ... but why it is not considered okay to erect a statue to Adolf Hitler, who also murdered millions of his own people. The short, if unsatisfying, answer is, of course, that Hitler lost the war and nobody erects statues to losers.

I thought about the who-gets-the-statue question again when I read this amazing article that reports on the erection in Sarajevo of a statue of Gavrilo Princip ... the man who murdered Austrian archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie and set in motion the events** that led to the First World War and its bitter outcomes that still bedevil our world today.


Evidently there are still people who believe that a politically-inspired murderer whose crime was indirectly responsible for two world wars and the deaths of tens of millions of people is a hero***. Bosnian Serb head of state Nebojsa Radmanovic attended the dedication of the statue, and said, "These fighters for freedom a hundred years ago have given us the direction to follow for the next hundred years."

If this is the attitude of such people, it looks as if the next hundred years are likely to be very unpleasant.

Who gets the statue, indeed?

Have a good day. More thoughts coming.

Bilbo

* Let us also not forget Mao Zedong, who also murdered tens of millions of his own people, but is nevertheless revered in China, it being too dangerous for the Communist Party to admit that its hero was a murderous dictator.

** My friend Arizona Dave points out that this is a wonderful example of the Butterfly Effect.

*** For another rumination on the subject of heroes, go back and read my post from August 26th, 2012, Another Word for Hero.

13 comments:

  1. In 1914, the Central Powers and the Allied Powers were spoiling for a fight, and the Great War had some dress rehearsals or false starts in the Balkans before.

    Still, it's a dumb idea for a statue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. An incredibly tasteless choice for a statue. Things are screwed up. When will they ever learn?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I would have been better if he remained an abject loser. He acted above his pay grade.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A piss-poor choice for a statue. At least they erected in amid crappy surroundings.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Agreed: Stalin gets a statue, BUT, we get to design the statue that depicts him. I'll get working on it right away...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I wondered if you were going to comment on this...

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is an example of using statuary to flip the bird to the civilized world. What a creepy move!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wait until the statute is up then sneak over there and put some bullets in its head.

    ReplyDelete
  9. A disgusting statue!

    ReplyDelete
  10. If I didn't see it in print, I would have dismissed it as something from The Onion.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This is a sick joke. But Vlad the Impaler is regarded as a hero in that area.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous9:00 PM

    Some people should not make history. They will flub it up.

    ReplyDelete